MODELING SOFTWARE

 

The programs listed below have been used for Harvard projects, or are widely-used programs. DOE-2 software is generally considered the industry standard. An energy simulation program (not a loads calculation program) that uses DOE-2 software should be used. eQUEST is preferable.

 

SOFTWARE

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

PROJECTS

equest logo

eQUEST

Pros:

  • Available free of charge online, so the model can be easily reviewed by HGCI or other sustainability consultants
  • Relatively easy to use
  • (Uses DOE2.2, so different from models done with DOE-2)
Law School NW Corner, Schlesinger Library

energy plus logo

EnergyPlus 1.4.0

Pros:
  • A DOE-2 tool
  • From the creators of BLAST and DOE-2 - merges the two programs
  • One of the most powerful - allows detailed analysis for complex designs
  • Includes time steps of less than one hour, modular systems and plant integrated with heat balance-based zone simulation, multizone air flow, thermal comfort, water use, natural ventilation, and photovoltaic systems
  • Can calculate life cycle costing
  • Can model specific design issues and innovations, such as photovoltaics, time units of less than one hour, and thermal comfort

Cons:

  • Stand along program without a 'user'-friendly graphical interface, reads and write as text files, which makes it more difficult to use. A graphic interface, and an possibly open source option, are under development, to increase usability.
None to date

visual doe logo

VisualDOE,

version 4.0.1

Pros:
  • A DOE-2.1E tool
  • Graphic interface with a customizable library of building elements
  • Good for modeling envelope and HVAC options - up to 20 options
  • Can print summaries, graphics, and hourly reports directly from the program

Cons:

  • Passive solar capabilities not as good
Hamilton Hall

visual spark logo

VisualSPARK

Pros:

  • Models complex building envelopes and mechanical systems beyond the scope of EnergyPlus and DOE-2
  • Runs 10-20 times faster than similar programs
  • Graphical interface
  • Available free of charge
None to date

trane trace logo

Trane Trace 700, version 4.1.1

Pros:

  • Good for sizing equipment and determining loads
  • Ability to model additional options, such as cogneration, heat recovery, and thermal storage
  • Can perform life cycle cost analysis

Cons:

  • Not DOE-2 software
  • Not as useful for energy simulation - mainly for sizing
  • Some limitation in modeling some architectural features
Blackstone, 90 Mount Auburn Street, 60 Oxford, One Western Avenue (Trane Trace 600)

elite software logo

Development, HVAC Loads Calculation Program, version 3.08

Cons:

  • Not DOE-2 software
  • More of a load calculation tool than energy modeling simulation
Zero Arrow Street

 

For more information:

 

U.S. Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Energy Software Tools Directory

 

Whole Building Design Guide: Energy Analysis Tools

 

Contrasting the Capabilities of 20 Building Simulation Programs, July 2005.

 

 

Updated: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:37 AM

Back to top